Colorado MED Bulletins on Licensees Making Recommendations for Pregnancy Related Morning Sickness

Colorado MED Bulletins on Licensees Making Recommendations for Pregnancy Related Morning Sickness

Colorado MED Bulletins for Packaging and Labeling

The Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division has issued an updated bulletin to cannabis licensees Colorado Flagwho may be recommending cannabis to women who are pregnant.  The first bulletin was issued on May 24, 2018.  An updated bulletin was issued on June 4, 2018 reference language to be added to the warning label effective July 1, 2018.  

Both of these bulletins essentially refer back to the original packaging and labeling bulletin issued on 02/16/2018.   

Beginning July 1, 2018 – “There may be long term physical or mental health risks from use of marijuana including additional risks for women who are or may become pregnant or are breast feeding. Use of marijuana may impair your ability to drive a car or operate machinery.”

Warning labels are not only important for public safety, but protect the cannabis licensee from additional liabilities.  If you’re concerned about additional protection, licensees may want to consider professional and product liability.  

Updated Bulletin 18-06 Updated (06/04/2018)

[pdf-embedder url=”http://cannabishempinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/180604-Updated-Industry-Bulletin-18-06-Reports-of-Licensees-Making-Recommendations1.pdf” title=”180604 Updated Industry Bulletin 18-06 Reports of Licensees Making Recommendations(1)”]

Original Bulletin 18-06 (05/24/2018):

[pdf-embedder url=”http://cannabishempinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/180524-Industry-Bulletin-18-06-Reports-of-Licensees-Making-Recommendations.pdf” title=”180524 Industry Bulletin 18-06 Reports of Licensees Making Recommendations”]

Packaging and Labeling Rules 18-03 (02/16/2018)

[pdf-embedder url=”http://cannabishempinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/IB-18-03-New-Packaging-and-Labeling-Rules-0216201811.pdf” title=”IB 18-03 New Packaging and Labeling Rules 02162018(11)”]

Colorado Bulletin on 420: Be Safe and Don’t Lose Your License

Colorado Bulletin on 420: Be Safe and Don’t Lose Your License

With 4-20 just around the corner, the Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division issues a bulletin Colorado Flagreminding the industry of what you can and can’t do.  For licensees participating in any 4/20 events, please be safe and obey the law.  Losing your license just isn’t worth it. 

Below are considered unlawful acts:

  • Buying, selling, transferring, or acquiring medical or retail marijuana in a manner not
    permitted by the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code and Colorado Retail Marijuana
    Code;
  • Offering for sale or soliciting an order for medical or retail marijuana except within
    the Licensed Premises of the Medical Marijuana Business or Retail Marijuana
    Establishment specifically designated for such sales;
  • Consuming or allowing the consumption of medical or retail marijuana on a Licensed
    Premises;
  • Providing public premises for the purpose of consumption of medical or retail
    marijuana;
  • Displaying any signs that are inconsistent with local laws or regulations or using
    advertising material that is misleading, deceptive, or false, or that is designed to
    appeal to minors;
  • and Having on the licensed premises any medical or retail marijuana or marijuana
    paraphernalia evidencing the consumption or use of the marijuana.

[pdf-embedder url=”http://cannabishempinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/IB-05-April-Marijuana-Related-Events-04062018.pdf” title=”IB-05 April Marijuana-Related Events 04062018″]

Massachusetts Recreational Insurance Requirements for Licensing

Massachusetts Recreational Insurance Requirements for Licensing

Commercial Liability and Product Liability Insurance LimitsWashington State Flag

The Massachusetts Cannabis Control Board is moving forward with the approval of 935 CMR 500.00 and includes commercial insurance.  Below are those important requirements:

Liability Insurance Coverage or Maintenance of Escrow (1) A Marijuana Establishment shall obtain and maintain general liability insurance coverage for no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in aggregate, annually, and product liability insurance coverage for no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in aggregate, annually, except as provided in 935 CMR 500.105(J)(2) or otherwise approved by the Commission. The deductible for each policy shall be no higher than $5,000 per occurrence.

This means procuring a commercial general liability policy with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 per aggregate and product liability with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 per aggregate.

What other insurance requirements exist in 935 CMR 500.00?

Licensees will need to purchase workers compensation insurance if they have employees.  The regulations does not indicate any other obligations such as naming the State of Massachusetts as an additional insured. 

What is the purpose of Commercial General Liability? 

This is a business insurance policy covering the premise or business location for liability, personal and advertising injury, and legal defense.  The State of Massachusetts has determined $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 per aggregate will provide adequate protection from third party lawsuits. 

What is the purpose of Product Liability? 

Product liability is a type of insurance policy protecting a cannabis company from third party lawsuits.  An example would be a recreational marijuana customer becomes sick from a cannabis product bought at a store.  The customer files a lawsuit against the retail and possibly the manufacturer.  The State of Massachusetts has determined $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 per aggregate will provide adequate protection from third party lawsuits. 

What does $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 per aggregate mean? 

Per occurrence is the maximum amount paid primarily for bodily injury and property damage.  Per aggregate is the the maximum paid for multiple types of claims. 

How do I buy insurance to meet the requirements in Massachusetts? 

Please contact us. 

Colorado Universal THC Warning Symbols

Colorado Universal THC Warning Symbols

Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division Rule on Warning Symbols for Packaging

The Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division has released new rules for the adoption of single Colorado Warning LabelUniversal Symbol to be used in the packaging, labeling, and product markings on a variety of products. 

Dear Marijuana Industry Stakeholders:

Effective  immediately,  the  State  Licensing  Authority  adopts  a  single  Universal  Symbol  (“Single  Universal Symbol”) for packaging, labeling, and on‐product marking of medical and retail marijuana, concentrate,  and  product  (“Inventory”)  pursuant  to  the  Medical  Marijuana  Rules  and  Retail.

Marijuana Rules, 1 CCR 212‐1 and 1 CCR 212‐2.

From  extensive  stakeholder  engagement  through  prior  focus  group  and  rulemaking  meetings Warning Symbol Used in Colorado that facilitated  a  comprehensive  review  and  discussion  of  our  labeling  framework,  the  State  Licensing Authority committed to evaluating the application of one Universal Symbol to both medical and retail Inventory.

The State Licensing Authority’s adoption of a Single Universal Symbol is intended to further protect  public  health  and  safety  by  enhancing  consumers’  ability  to  identify  products  containing marijuana.  Further,  by  eliminating  distinctions  between  Universal  Symbols  for  medical  and  retail marijuana,  the  Single  Universal  Symbol  works  to  simplify  and  improve  compliance  regarding packaging, labeling, and product marking requirements.

 

[pdf-embedder url=”http://cannabishempinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/IB-18-04-Universal-Symbol-Rules.pdf” title=”Colorado MED Universal Symbol Rules”]

What can be Learned from the only Lawsuit filed by a Cannabis Company against their Insurance Carrier

What can be Learned from the only Lawsuit filed by a Cannabis Company against their Insurance Carrier

Dispensary Green Earth Wellness against Atain Specialty Insurance

The cannabis industry has experienced few lawsuits involving a cannabis operation suing their insurance company.  We’re aware of just one  and it occurred when Green Earth Wellness Center (“Green Earth”) of Colorado Springs, Colorado filed a lawsuit against their insurance carrier Atain Specialty Insurance Company (“Atain”) back on December 20, 2013. The case is filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado entitled The Green Earth Wellness Center LLC, Plaintiff v Atain Specialty Insurance Company, Defendant Civil Action No. 13-CV-03452-MSK-NYW.

Green Earth believed insurance coverage existed for living cannabis plants damaged by smoke from a nearby wildfire known as the Waldon Canyon Fire.  That smoke damage made those plants essentially worthless.  Green Earth claimed $200,000 to their grow facility primarily mother plants and clones and $40,000 in damage to buds and flowers.

Green Earth is a small business licensed by the State of Colorado to produce and sell medical marijuana from two locations.  Atain is part of a large insurance empire known as the H.W. Kaufman Group that includes a subsidiary named Burns & Wilcox with over $1 Billion in premium written.  Burns & Wilcox represented Atain as their licensed wholesaler underwriting Green Earth’s request for insurance. 

Court records show Green Earth purchased through a retail insurance broker introduced by Burns & Wilcox.  The policy included commercial general liability and business personal property.  For those who may be unfamiliar with insurance, commercial general liability covers liability for a variety of reason related to your business and premise.  The commercial general liability was never the issue during the lawsuit because no liability existed from a third party.  The lawsuit was seeking payment for the property damaged by smoke.    

Green Earth Wellness focused on the Definition of Stock

If coverage for a living plant was to be available, Green Earth would focus on the business personal property coverages because this is where a policy offers coverage for “things” a business owns.  A cannabis company will own a variety of things such as grow equipment, computers, lighting, hvac systems, and cannabis.  That cannabis might be alive or cured depending on the stage of production.  If coverage is to exist, Green Earth would review their insurance policy for important terms and conditions to lead them in the right direction. 

One of those terms most likely to catch the attention of Green Earth was the word “Stock.”  The insurance policy defined stock as

“merchandise held in storage or for sale, raw materials and in-process or finished goods, including supplies used in their packing or shipping.” 

It was the “raw materials and in-process or finished goods” Green Earth believed their living cannabis plants fall neatly into this definition.  Many people reading this definition would consider this to be plausible.  Marijuana clones will eventually mature into budding plants.  Those buds are the raw materials for a variety of finish products such as joints, concentrates, and edibles. 

However, most insurance industry professionals with experience in cannabis insurance during this time period would have known stock was never meant to cover living plants on the business personal property policy.  This would have been difficult for Green Earth to know, unless they had been working with an experienced retail insurance broker.  In 2012, there may have been one insurance carrier offering crop insurance to the cannabis industry during this period of time.       

Green Earth believed coverage was purchased because of a medical marijuana crop application had been completed

Court records show a medical marijuana crop application was part of the underwriting process.  How this form became part of the application process was murky by Green Earth and others deposed.  A typical application will include standardized forms known within the insurance industry as Acord forms.  Court records indicate Acord form numbers 125, 126, and 140 were submitted by the retail insurance broker to Burns & Wilcox. 

Quite possibly, the medical marijuana crop application was part of another submission to a different insurance carrier and was inadvertently included with the submission to Burns & Wilcox. 

Green Earth Wellness Marijuana Crop Application

Medical marijuana crop application

Regardless, the fact a medical marijuana crop application was part of the underwriting file showed the possibility crop insurance was part of the insurance request. 

The quote stated “Coverage does not extend to growing or standing plants.”

The quote and binder issued by Atain to Green Earth both stated “Coverage does not extend to growing or standing plants.”  Most business owners contemplating the purchase of insurance are likely to read this statement and decide quickly this policy is not the right choice.

Atain Insurance Quote for Green Earth Wellness

Court records indicate the retail insurance broker reviewed the insurance quote with Green Earth.  Those same records further indicated neither the retail insurance broker and Green Earth having any recall of discussing this important disclosure.  Atain had every right to believe they were not offering coverage for living plants.

Clear communication is essential during the procurement of insurance with the cannabis industry

Clear communication is a foundation in having good business relationships.  Insurance is a complicated product that should be sold by experienced professionals with a good understanding of important terms and conditions.  The Green Earth lawsuit could have been avoided if evidence existed to demonstrate a mutual understanding of the coverages being purchased by those parties involved.